|
LYMINGE ASSOCIATION NEWS
Tuesday 23rd September 2008 at 7.30 p.m. in
the Lyminge Village Hall Club room
A Memorial bench
Lyminge Heritage Questions and Answers
The format of this month's article is a
little different. Mr Roy Collins contacted me to tell me his
memories of Lyminge between the wars. I went to see him and
spent a pleasant time whilst he and his wife reminisced. Roy was
born in 1915 and, apart from wartime, has mostly lived in the
village.
This will be an historical journey around
Lyminge starting at the Station, which of course was the hub of
the village life. It was a hive of activity because most of the
village trader's goods arrived by train. The station master was
Mr Noble who lived in Station Road. There were two cottages at
the station. The station porter lived in number 1 and the plate
layer (i.e. railway maintenance man) lived at number 2. Mr
Collins' remembers his sister saying she viewed the arrival of
King George V and Lord Kitchener, by train, at Lyminge Station
from Sawyers the ironmonger's shop in Station Road during WW I.
These notable visitors then rode on horseback to Beachborough
House where they inspected the Canadian troops billeted there.
It is interesting to note that although the traders have changed
the same building has been used as a hardware shop for nearly a
century.
Other traders that Mr Collins recollects when
he was young include Mr Brocklesby the barber and Mr Poulson the
chemist in Station Road. Mr Fisher lived in Well Cottages at the
end of Mayfield Road and made chestnut hurdles in Well Field.
Fred Hopton was landlord at the Coach and Horses whilst Mr
Ripley was across the road at the forge. Tommy Hogben the
milkman lived at Bedingfield Farm along the High Street. At the
end of the High Street was a small sweet shop run by Mrs
Rickwood. Nearby were two old ladies who lived in the old
Methodist chapel that was situated between the farm and the
forge. Roy recollects that they were rather frightening in
appearance because of their long hair and enormous hats. They
were nicknamed 'Angels' by the village children. At the
Churches, Rev. Rutty was the incumbent at the Parish Church
whilst Rev. Clifton was the Methodist minister.
When Mr Collins was young, he attended the
village school [now Church Mews]. Mr Marsh was the head whilst
his wife was one of the teachers. Miss Gaskell taught the
infants. The final teacher was Miss Wyatt who was a country
dancing expert. She taught her pupils these dances and they won
several competitions at Maidstone. Mr Collins in particular
remembers 'Rufty Tufty' that I have found dates back to at least
1651 when it first appeared in Playford's English Dancing
Master. Below is a transcription of the tune:

Besides the country dancing, Roy remembers
that the older boys at school were taught gardening and the
school had its own garden in Mayfield Road. He also recalls how
good the teaching was. He describes it as, "All drummed in but
it worked." For Roy it certainly did work, as he passed the
exams and went to the Wlliam Harvey Grammar School.
This ends this month's article but it is not
the end of Mr Collins' recollections. They will have to wait
until next time including the promised horses with leather
horseshoes and the famous railway developer living in the
village as well as the village lamplighter who studied the
stars. Finally, here is a new question:
Q11 What was Lyminge's involvement in the
1830 'Captain Swing' agricultural riots?
Can you answer this latest question or any of
the others? If you can, contact me through the editor or the
www.lyminge.org.uk/forums. Alistair Bailey
Letters to the Editor
Hearty congratulations to the thieves who
stripped the lead off the church roof! We sincerely hope that
the few hundred pounds you have earned from your labours will
bring you much happiness, not only in the short term but for
many years to come. It was a shame you had to leave in such a
hurry when the police arrived, had you stuck around we would
have been able to let you know what was going to happen as a
result of your visit. As it is, we shall have to rely on the
fact that someone may pass this on to you.
Lyminge church is 1,000 years old, give or
take a year or two, and because of its great age, requires a
constant programme of maintenance. Last year the Architect made
his five-yearly report on the state of the building and,
together with earthquake damage repairs which meant that the
insurance excess was pushed up to £1,000, the cost of essential
repairs amounted to £34,950 Your handiwork has brought this
figure up to £155,000+VAT These essential repairs are only
emergency 'patch-up' repairs. They are not restorative repairs.
The restorative repairs are things like the prohibitively
expensive repair work needed to keep the tower open for the next
few years; the restoration of the stained glass window above the
altar; the repairs needed to restore the rotting timbers in the
roof (you were very lucky not to have fallen through it); the
death-watch beetle damage; the crumbling stonework; etc., etc.,
etc. To restore the church properly would cost hundreds of
thousands of pounds. You may have been under the impression that
the damage you did to the roof and to the organ and those areas
inside the church which were soaked by rain coming in through
the gaping holes you made, would be covered by the Church's
Insurance Company. Indeed the roof was insured for £15,000.
However, it may interest you to know that the few hundred pounds
you received for the stolen lead in no way reflects the £120,000
cost of replacing it. You may have also been under the
impression that the Diocese of Canterbury would foot the bill.
In actual fact the Diocese does not contribute a penny to this
or any other Parish Church. Nor does it pay for the Vicar's
wages, the cost of heating, electric or any other running cost.
Conversely, this Church and every other Church in the Diocese is
expected to pay the Diocese a yearly lump sum of money which, in
Lyminge's case is £38,826. Neither does the Church receive money
from English Heritage (which demands that any repair work to the
grade one listed building should conform to the highest, and
most expensive, standards), or any other government body. You
may well ask how this money is raised each year. The answer to
that is simple; it isn't. The only income the Parish Church
receives is from the Summer Fete, Saint Nicholas' Fair, the
weekly collection from the (on average) 50-strong congregation,
most of who are retired and living on a pension, and a few
donations from church and non-church members. The amount of
money raised from these sources each year falls short of the
required sum by a considerable amount. And on top of all this,
the Church Council is expected to pay for all maintenance and
repairs to the building. This is not a sustainable situation and
it is heading to an inevitable outcome. The Church will close.
Your activities last Wednesday have ensured this will happen in
the very near future. Oh well done you!
Very soon the church door will be locked for
the last time and the building will be handed over to a
decommissioning agency, the churchyard will be closed for
burials and interments and handed over to Shepway District
Council. If Lyminge is to follow a similar fate to that of other
decommissioned parish churches, and it most probably will, the
decommissioning agency will employ an Architect to gain planning
permission to convert the building to two or three residential
units and to build a couple of new houses on the church car
park. The agency will then sell the building and land to a
developer and, in the meantime, Shepway District council will
remove the older and unstable headstones and walls from the
churchyard and clear it for mowing so that it loses its
character and looks the same as every other municipal cemetery
in the district. Please don't think that this could never occur.
It will. We don't suppose for one minute that you care about
this church or any other hapless church you have visited. We,
however, do care and what is more, we have no intention of
letting the inevitable happen if we can possibly help it.
It is not about 'ownership', religion or
denomination. It is about a very old, a very beautiful and very
vulnerable Old Lady and we can no longer expect a small number
of people to bear the burden of maintaining the most
architecturally and historically important building in the
parish. This letter has not been written by the Church Council
or any other member of the Church, we don't happen to be members
of the Church, we are just residents of this parish though we
understand all too well that, unless the building continues to
function as a place of worship, it will be lost forever. We also
understand that short term injections of cash are not going to
resolve the enormous problems of maintaining and restoring the
church and churchyard. To that end a few of us have already
arranged with the Treasurer of the PCC for a small amount of
money to be debited from our accounts each month to go towards
the maintenance and repair of the building. It is not much -
about the price of a bottle of wine per month - we don't earn
much but we don't miss it. We have done some sums and worked
out, that if enough wage-earning residents in the parish who
cared about the church building did the same, there would be
sufficient annual income to begin to address the real problems
of maintaining and restoring the building for the future. We
hope, from the bottom of our hearts that some good may come of
the mischief you made. You may have stolen the lead off the roof
but you will not steal the church!
PS We would respectfully suggest that you get a
proper job and start contributing to society.
Name and address withheld


|